The reading passage explores the issue of what agnostids ate or how they behaved and gives us three theories about it, the professor's lecture deals with the same issue, however, she thinks that all of the three speculations have weaknesses, and she uses three specific reasons to support her idea.
First, even though the reading suggest that agnostids can be free-swimming predators, since they are related to arthropods and other types of arthropods were good at swimming. The professor argues in the lecture that most swimming predators have large eyes, this is because predators needs good vision to see preys. However, agnostids are animals with tiny eyes or even blind, and there are not other evidence proving that agnostids have other ability to detect preys, so that agnostids are unlikely to be free-swimming predators.
Moreover, contrary to the statement of the reading that agnostids may lived on the seafloor and ate dead organisms, the professor contends that agnostids are not living this way, it is the fact that seafloor animals usually do not move fast and they like occupying an area, whereas there are evidences showing that agnostids are able to move at a high speed, because researchers find their fossils within in a long distance.
Finally, the author of the reading claims that agnostids are parasites, but the professor proves this claim is indefensible by pointing out that parasites can not have large population, because organisms will be killed by parasites living on them if the population of parasites is too much. But scientists find lots of fossils of agnostids, in other words, the population of agnostids are very large, as a consequence, agnostids are not likely to be parasites.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...he same issue, however, she thinks that all of the three speculations have weaknesses, and...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'whereas', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238709677419 0.229887763892 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.18064516129 0.158761421928 114% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0838709677419 0.0866891130778 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0516129032258 0.046263068375 112% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0354838709677 0.0685040099705 52% => OK
Prepositions: 0.132258064516 0.118717715034 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0322580645161 0.0351676179071 92% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.69704406365 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0258064516129 0.0309702414327 83% => OK
Particles: 0.00322580645161 0.00188951952338 171% => OK
Determiners: 0.0870967741935 0.0887237588012 98% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0129032258065 0.0209618222197 62% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00645161290323 0.0139019557991 46% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1723.0 2387.08602151 72% => OK
No of words: 281.0 408.028673835 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.13167259786 5.86048508987 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.48200974243 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.373665480427 0.338922669872 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.298932384342 0.251872472559 119% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.213523131673 0.174417080927 122% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.163701067616 0.112833075102 145% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69704406365 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551601423488 0.524397521467 105% => OK
Word variations: 56.2087046594 59.2087087015 95% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 20.6684587814 34% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 40.1428571429 20.5533526081 195% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 92.3007506547 48.84282405 189% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 246.142857143 120.699889404 204% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 40.1428571429 20.5533526081 195% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.42857142857 0.644075263715 222% => Less Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 70.036095577 45.7405998639 153% => OK
Elegance: 1.50602409639 1.45489161554 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352696845585 0.300154397459 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.23195994278 0.103427244359 224% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0647764510845 0.0752933317313 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.796542035112 0.497263757937 160% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.157075379396 0.151897553556 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200796205166 0.114077575197 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071677066108 0.0781384742642 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.320575134748 0.336927656856 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0767779837732 0.067059652881 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255670982037 0.210909579961 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386193277917 0.0618886996521 62% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8870967742 25% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 8.42114695341 24% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 5.0 13.6433691756 37% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.