There are certain considerations that everyone can take into account to investigate and examine the issue of how to deal with situation when professor or leader makes a mistake in a speech. Someone contends it is best to talk to them alone after that, while others choose to keep silence. However, I believe that correct the mistake right away is the most beneficial thing to do, for not only can it provides accurate information immediately, but also is essential for comprehending the whole speech.
First and foremost, correcting the mistakes right away let all the audiences know the accurate concept immediately, contributing to a better comprehension to what the speaker is talking about. For instance, if a student points out a wrong thing the professor mentioned, all the classmates will notice it. Otherwise, the professor can only correct it during the next lecture, which means some students may have forgotten about the concept or have absorbed the wrong idea! It is vividly clear that it is not good for students' learning.
Furthermore, the coherence between different information is another noticeable factor. Bearing something wrong in mind is likely to affect the understanding of information after that. Let's imaging the situation of a math teacher giving students a wrong formula accidentally. If this mistake is not pointed out, it will be impossible for the students to complete all the exercises related to this in class, and even cannot understand other theories based on this formula.
Last but not least, an additional support come into my mind is speakers should encourage other people to correct his mistakes right away, which contributes to a more freedom atmosphere. No one can deny the fact that with the rapid trend towards modernization, more and more people now want to express themselves freely, and this is also good for spurring spirit and encouraging innovation. Whether it is in a university, institute or enterprise, a free environment will absolutely have some profits. So, teachers or managers, as a leader of a group, should provide opportunities for everyone to talk freely and equally.
Due to the aforementioned ground, although someone may have their own justification that interrupting speakers to correct them is not polite, I still asserts that it is proper and beneficial to do so.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 151, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'assert'
Suggestion: assert
... to correct them is not polite, I still asserts that it is proper and beneficial to do ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, while, for instance, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19841269841 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98133124507 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568783068783 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9062755354 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139452678051 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445477207 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382519339509 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764573462043 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273103488987 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.