We have to learn to behave properly and politely whatsoever in the social gathering and meeting. To interrupt anyone in the middle of any talk or lecture is not suave thing to do. We have to wait till the end if the missing part or error be corrected by the speaker. In my opinion, in any meeting, if my teacher or leader gives any mistake point then I will wait till the end and discuss with that particular person one-on-one. Definitely, it is not advisable to let go of incorrect thing and stay silent. However, there are several ways of communicating where we can find out the scope of correction and proper interpretation.
Firstly, the person may be going through personal issues due to which he may be unable to focus and may have made some silly faults. This does not mean anyone has right to humiliate him right in front of mass. Life is not easy. Everyone is going through some sorts of convolution. Therefore, we have to understand the situation and tackle it carefully. If we find out anything missing or error, we can suggest them in person, so that from next time, they will not address the same errors. For instance, one office employee was so keen to learn more that he interrupted in the middle of the meeting asking some correction in the presentation. The boss was so disguised that he could not handle his stubbornness and fired him right away. Therefore, one has to be more careful and picky about how to handle the situation.
Secondly, interrupting one in the middle of something is like intruding in someone's personal space. In any meeting, the leader or teacher always comes with preparation because it is a crucial part of his job. In the same way, in the rush, he might have forgotten something or might have stored it for the last. Hence, trying to correct someone in the meeting during the critical timing is not a genuine step. We have to wait until he addresses the conclusion. For an example, one friend of mine interrupted my chemistry teacher in the lecture hour adding up he has missed balancing the reaction. The teacher told him that the reaction is yet to be finished and he had planned to balance it in the end. So, my friend was proved to be oaf in the classroom.
Thirdly, when we plan to communicate with the specific person alone, it will help develop the communication more clearer and easy. Even if you have heard something, you will be corrected. Or, if he has missed something, he will certainly add it and even address it in future meeting or classroom. And if he has not figured out where he has gone wrong, from next time he will surely not repeat it. Thus, to have direct communication is the significant task one can do. This will help improve the relationship between the people and increase the level of understanding as well.
In conclusion, everyone does mistake and there is cope of improvement. We have to take a right way to correct it. We have no right to mortify anyone. So, everything has to be done with great observations and practicality. We all have right to information. Thus, it depends on us how we handle the situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...ion and tackle it carefully. If we find out anything missing or error, we can sugge...
^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...meone in the meeting during the critical timing is not a genuine step. We have to...
^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'clearer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: clearer
... it will help develop the communication more clearer and easy. Even if you have heard someth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2549.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 553.0 407.700716846 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60940325497 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84932490483 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69238732498 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471971066908 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 810.9 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.6003584229 170% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4348660517 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.8285714286 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.97142857143 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145759659692 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377009438646 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321950204474 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863571445732 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033314492916 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.