In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that elephants are so fascinating because they show some surprising behaviors that have not been observed in other animals. While in the listening the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and believes that all surprising beliefs about elephants are as a result of the misunderstanding of their behaviors.
First of all, in the text, it is clearly mentioned that old elephants leave herd because they are aware of their death. However, the professor claims that this observation cannot confirm that they are aware of their death. Old elephants have thin teeth, so they were separated from the herd to find smoother vegetation to eat which they are common near water, the misunderstand about elephant grave.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that elephants have the ability of painting. She says that elephants learn to keep brush with their trunk and paint just through human training, not by an inherited ability. Elephants have very sensitive ears that trainers use it to train them.
Finally, in the text, it is stated that elephants fair of mice. The professor subscribes that elephants fair of mice is because they are unfamiliar with such this small animal. Nonetheless, elephants in the zoo do not fair of mice because they are known this animal.
- TPO 40 61
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. 76
- For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. 83
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. Agree or disagree? 73
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...o eat which they are common near water, the misunderstand about elephant grave. In addition, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, nonetheless, so, while, in addition, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 1977.66487455 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 223.0 407.700716846 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07623318386 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.48103885553 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65411761694 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 212.727598566 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547085201794 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 618.680645161 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0928269615 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.909090909 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160114684429 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071978210812 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286878919055 0.0737576698707 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103800625991 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136299734725 0.0645574589148 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 86.8835125448 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.