universities should spend more money on salaries of university professors
In the last three decades, the quality of education has become a common trend. Having said that, some people believe that in order to enhance the level of education universities should allocate more fund on salaries of their porfessors. Nevertheless, there is a substantial body of evidence claims that universities should spend money just on their facilities. From a personal perspective, universities should put more funds on professors salaries given that it has a positive impact on their motivation, attraction and the learning process. Below I will strive to explain my supporting points in more details.
The first and foremost point, provided that universities increase professors' wages, they could promote their motivation to educate students. To put it in other words, when professors get more salaries, they will be more satisfied and just focus on educating students. A vivid example that could be given to shed light on what was elaborated above is, two years ago, one of my friends was a faculty professor. He told me that he had to get another part-time job, since his salary was not sufficient. In additon to that, he had kids to raise and mortgage to pay, so he worked as a counsltant and tutor beside being a professor. Given that the high cost of living, he could not focus on his proitity career. Therefore, if universities spend more money on professors' salaries will boost their motivation to focus on one career, which amplify the potential learning outcomes.
Next, coupled with motivated professors, attract qualified students to be a faculty is another virtue of increasing professors salaries. To illustrate this point, many students nowadys prefer to work in big companies instead of being university professors since universities pay them low salaries compared to big companies' wages. For instance, five years ago, my brother graduated from business school. Even though the university offered him a job, he refused this job because he got another job in a printing company with higher salary. Thus, because of unversities' low salaries, they could not attract qualified students to be professors. If they could not solve this problem, all the experienced professors will retire and they could not find other professor to thake over their palces. As a result, the quality of education will decline. Howeverm if university allocate more money of professor university, they could compensate the retired professors and continue to exapnd and progress.
Taking everything into consideration, without a doubt, spending more money on salaries for unoversity professor is imperative and has many benefits and underestimating these benefits is not logical. It is suggested that universities compromise and ensure that they give professors sufficient salaries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts and underestimating these benefits is not logical. It is suggested that univer...
^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey give professors sufficient salaries.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2345.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32954545455 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92402417148 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515909090909 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 745.2 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2728555303 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.590909091 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439991569099 0.236089414692 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128092994285 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121982063033 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310767021336 0.150856017488 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770848066536 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.