tpo 17 the human population decline birds' numbers
The material discusses that the growth of the human population affects the number of birds. While the reading claims that birds in the future will be fewer and fewer, the professor challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
First, the author says that exploit wildlife by humans will decline birds' numbers. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this and states that urban growth may affect some birds' species, but it could provide better habitats for others. The professor mentions that there is no uniform story that could affect all birds' species. To put it in other words, some species will shrink; however, others will grow.
Second, the writer mentions that increasing agriculture could also destructive birds habitats. On the contrary, the lecturer contradicts this and points out that it is true that agriculture could affect birds' numbers, but in the US, people stated to cultivate less and less land. The speaker adds that people now cultivate new crops that use less land and give more harvests.
Third, the reading posits that using pesticides in agriculture could poison birds. Conversely, the listening contradicts this and contends that the point about pesticides is incorrect. The lecturer explains that people started to be aware of pesticides' consequences, so they follow two strategies. First, people use new much less toxic pesticides. Secondly, the professor adds people cultivate pests resistant crops, which do not need pesticides. The lecturer adds that these crops could not harm birds at all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...tates that urban growth may affect some birds species, but it could provide better ha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, while, in other words, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29795918367 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4787106858 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555102040816 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.19837553 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5333333333 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323713832622 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110979014102 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645719910123 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187765491912 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287163915693 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.