students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. Do you agree or disagree?

Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. Do you agree or disagree?

People may be shifting to the idea that libraries are unnecessary these days due to the fact that students have easy access to information via the internet. I disagree with this because libraries allow people to not only attain specialised types of information but also provide a quiet environment to study.
Firstly, one reason to support libraries is that some types of specialised information cannot be found on the Internet. For instance, the Toronto reference library is a closed reserve facility where patrons can only access information on-site. In other words, some well-known academic authors do not immediately publish their recent work online, instead, they publish books explaining their analyses and results. To put it in another way, these books are usually found in school and public libraries before they appear on the world wide web. Thus, supporting libraries would give the community access to these valuable resources.
Coupled with having a wealth of information, a suitable study environment is another benefit of a library. To illustrate this, research carried out by Oxford University in 2015 stated that students spent a large proportion of their time in the library researching and writing. In fact, libraries are perfect environments for this as they are very quiet and everyone there is motivated to study. Libraries have very strict noise rules and offer a large space with comfortable seating arrangements. As a result, they create an academic environment that encourages deep concentration.
Finally, the quality control is hard to be achieved in the online subjects. While the reference and books in libraries were revised before publishing that ensured their quality. For example, the schools in Canada restricted the usage of the online materials in the students’ research due to the misinformation has been found in these materials. Despite the large amount of information has been existed online, students cannot rely on these materials. Consequently, libraries are significant as a guidance to the students in the research.
In conclusion, although the internet is of great benefit to students, I believe that libraries are still necessary as they grant access to specialized sources of information and their facilities provide better conditions for studying. It is suggested that more funding goes into libraries to ensure that they are well-deigned and resourceful facilities for a community.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 633, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity access to these valuable resources. Coupled with having a wealth of informat...
^^^
Line 6, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idance to the students in the research. In conclusion, although the internet is ...
^^^
Line 7, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...resourceful facilities for a community.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, may, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2169.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46347607053 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96957994341 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536523929471 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 693.0 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3189405716 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.285714286 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9047619048 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95238095238 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349032483044 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112186341195 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168650112954 0.0737576698707 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262790873359 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.331836479627 0.0645574589148 514% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.