tpo 28 the Peary reached to the North pole
The material discusses the fact of reaching Robert E. Peary to the North pole. While the reading claims some declarations ensured that he reached the North pole, the listening disagrees and says that there is no solid evidence the Peary reached the North pole, and the reading claims are unconvincing.
First, the author states that the committee that done by the National Geographic society concluded that Peary reached the North Pole. On the other hand, the professor opposes this and mentions that the committee was not objective. The lecturer adds the members of this committee were from Peary's friends, and they were contributed to funding his travel to the North Pole. Furthermore, the speaker says that this committee took two days, so they did not examine his travel properly. The lecturer concluded that the committee's investigation was biased and not trustworthy.
Second, the writer points out that Peary could reach the North pole in thirty-seven days since Avery did the same travel in less than thirty-seven days. On the contrary, the professor refutes this and contends that Avery's travel was different than Peary's. The lecturer explains that Avery's slide was less weight than Peary's one because he did not transport his food in his slide. The speaker says that the food was dropped to him by an airplane. Moreover, the listening posits that the weather condition when Avery did his travel was more favorable than when Peary traveled to The North Pole.
Third, the reading states that there are many photographs taken by Peary to support his claim. Conversely, the lecturer contradicts this and says that the photos that could use to detect the sun's position should be very precise. However, the professor mentions that the Peary used a primitive camera, so its picture was fussy and worn. Likewise, the speaker adds that the shadow was blurred and not accurate, so it could not detect the exact position of the sun.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'committees'' or 'committee's'?
Suggestion: committees'; committee's
...operly. The lecturer concluded that the committees investigation was biased and not trustw...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ntends that Averys travel was different than Pearys. The lecturer explains that Aver...
^^^^
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: DID_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...her condition when Avery did his travel was more favorable than when Peary traveled...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ect the exact position of the sun.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, second, so, third, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05607476636 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45645691371 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476635514019 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 16.0 8.23620309051 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.093765957 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4705882353 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.484677502006 0.272083759551 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16835268212 0.0996497079465 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131272710784 0.0662205650399 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304927297407 0.162205337803 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865523306429 0.0443174109184 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.