solutions to prevent birds from being injured by window glass
The material discusses possible solutions that businesses can use to prvent injuries to birds. While the reading mentions three solutions of this problem, the listening challenges all these solutions and states that they are not effective to stop birds being injuried.
First, the writer posits that using one-way glass rather than regular glass could help. On the other hand, the professor opposses this and states that one-way glass could reflect like mirrors, and mirrors are as bad as regular glass. The lecturer explains that birds do not understand mirrors, so if these mirrors reflect the sky or trees, birds could fly right into them. As a result, this solution could not work.
Second, the author states that painting window glass with colorful lines could prevent birds from flying through glass. On the contrary, the speaker refutes this and contends that painting glass with coloful lines should have opening to keep inside people see outside. The professor states that birds could consider these opens as holes and fly through them. The lecturer adds that if window glass are painted with extremely small holes, the rooms of the building will be too dark.
Third, the reading suggestes to create an artificial magnatic field to guide birds away from buildings. Conversely, the speaker contradicts this and claims that birds could use their magnatic sense when they travel long distances. When birds migrate from a cold countery to a warm one during winter. Nevertheless, the lecturer mentions that birds just use their eyes and the bright of light to travel short distances in a city. Consequently, using an artificial magnatic field is not a proper solution
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... sense when they travel long distances. When birds migrate from a cold countery to a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, while, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18014705882 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32945249797 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551470588235 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8850343892 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9333333333 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338064384606 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10817049349 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750004199749 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187236869903 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476626702453 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.