using printed materiles or internet.
Some people think that internet materials are easily to access. People believe that internet is more convenient. Although I understand their point of view, I have a different opinion. I believe that printed materials are more preferable for me because Printed materials are more convenient, and printed materials are trustworthy.
First of all, books are more convenient to read. Printed materials like books and articles are easily to handle. You can easily access the books any time; there is a punch of books available at libraries. For example, I remember when I was in college; I was assigned to do some projects. It was easy and fast for me to go to the campus library and search for all books I had to use them. Furthermore, reading books is much way better than using the internet. For instance, I would read the book and mark the important parts; also I can highlight the part that I would like to read it back. That was really helpful for me while I was studying during college. As you can see printed materials are more convenient.
In addition, printed materials are trustworthy. Books are published by known publisher for example, as I mention before I was assigned to do some projects, the professor was usually point us to some important books. Our professor specified the books for us and he also mentioned the publisher name, he said that the books with those publishers should be trusted and they are better than the information on the internet. On the other hand the information on the internet is not trustworthy and we never know who published the article, or even if the information in the article is right or wrong. This experience taught me that books are the most trusted materials to get information.
In conclusion, printed materials are more preferable for me. I recommend every one to use books. Books are better than internet information. Books are easily to use and in the same time books are trusted materials.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rinted materials are trustworthy. First of all, books are more convenient ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 666, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...me while I was studying during college. As you can see printed materials are more ...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d materials are more convenient. In addition, printed materials are trust...
^^^^
Line 8, column 187, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'pointed'.
Suggestion: pointed
...ome projects, the professor was usually point us to some important books. Our profess...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 688, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t trusted materials to get information. In conclusion, printed materials a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, really, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 335.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85671641791 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73581723135 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462686567164 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8828908137 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.9545454545 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2272727273 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13636363636 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189009410781 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721811517658 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063163128934 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151596949626 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618110819861 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.78 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.