A controversial debate which is raised about the pros and cons of children watching television. Some groups of people hold the view that watching television is entertaining for children. However, some other groups may hold an opposing view and feel that it is more harmful to our children. From my vantage view, I concur with the latter groups and believe that watching television may cause children some health problem, simultaneously, it distract children from doing their home works.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that children who watch television for a long period of time may have some health problems. Although watching television do entertain kinds, they involuntarily may spend extended period of time watching it. A vivid example to shed light on what was elaborated above, is the number of hours my kids spend watching television. Sometimes not less than three hours. Such habit may cause a sedentary life style which eventually results in the development of obesity.
The second point which deserves some words is that watching television distracts children from doing their home work. children who develop this habit may not focus well in studies, thus fail in their exams. For instance, the latest reported score of children showed a remarkable decline, the teachers attributed this decline to lack of focus caused by television distraction.
Although the aforementioned reasons are fist to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. In fact, there is another subtle point. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible statistics published in children Heath Journal. The study reviled that watching television may lead to the development of attentive deficit syndrome. A type of disease which could affect the intelligence capabilities of children
To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned reasons, one's soon realizes that children could be adversely affected by watching television. Thus, it is the parents responsibility to be cautions and warn their children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 441, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'distracts'?
Suggestion: distracts
...some health problem, simultaneously, it distract children from doing their home works. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hildren who watch television for a long period of time may have some health problems. Although...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
..., they involuntarily may spend extended period of time watching it. A vivid example to shed li...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Children
...ts children from doing their home work. children who develop this habit may not focus we...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 156, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
...by watching television. Thus, it is the parents responsibility to be cautions and warn ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to be cautions and warn their children.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, well, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 318.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40880503145 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9466600192 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4474666205 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5555555556 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303498910159 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100313379863 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816361004047 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17660859452 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585984181326 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.