When it comes to the acquisition of the information, some people prefer Internet while others go for books. Which one do you prefer?
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">With 5G coming, more and more people get connected on the Internet. The netizens leave comments on controversial topics, share moments on social media, contribute knowledge to Wikipedia. The Internet has done a huge influence on human daily life, including how to get the needed information. For me, the Internet is an ideal way to acquire knowledge rather than books. I will support my point from three aspects: diversity, spread speed, and efficiency of fixing mistakes.
To begin with, the Internet always offers much more information than books do. The reason is quite simple: space is not an issue online but has a profound influence on the content of books. We all know that there is limited space in those printed and bound books, so writers and editors need to make decisions for readers what comes into books and what does not. This might reduce diversity in the taste of readers by some means. By contrast, when it comes to the online platform, everyone could contribute to the edition and share their own and specific knowledge, leading to the fact from various voices. This kind of information could only be found online but never goes into printed books.
In addition, the world changes rapidly, and such changes, even if we choose to report them to the public by the fastest newspapers or magazines, spread much more quickly on the Internet. Let us take the Oscar awards ceremony as a good example. Even though we are in China, we could immediately know who wins the best actor, which movie comes out to be the best international movie and so on via the Internet. No one is expecting to get such news from the newspapers until the next day since it is too late.
Admittedly, many people who refuse to refer to Internet claim that there are amounts of rumors and inaccurate response. However, it is hardly ensured that books never contain errors and typos. It is not how many errors are contained, but how fast such mistakes can be corrected or eliminated that matters. For those printed and bound books, it would not be modified till next re-edition, while inaccurate messages could be rapidly noticed by the monitors and be corrected or erased.
Hence, I would say the Internet is an ideal place to find whatever you need more exhaustively, rapidly, and accurately.</span><br>
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, while, in addition, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97969543147 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87973887319 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565989847716 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.036393276 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175332385286 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432472628642 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314171092694 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825867537903 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229713538656 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.