Which do you prefer, to buy new technological devices immediately after they become available or to wait till many people have adopted (=accepted and started to use) them?
Thanks to the science developers’ endless efforts, many techniques are updated in years or even in months. New generations keep showing up to the mass and some of them can cause a new trend for people to follow. Not changing old devices by the latest ones maybe thought out-of-date. However, I do not think this is necessary and can benefit users.
First of all, there are some inevitable drawbacks in the newest tools at the beginning. In order to faster than competitors, many companies tend to publicize their new product in hurry, sometimes before the final testing. In that case, the newest technological device may own some little flaws, such as unstable recharging function, brittle screens and stumble operation. Although they are just small problems, users’ experience may become bad. The newest generation is always not the best one, so people do not need to pursue them.
In addition, it takes time for other fields and companies to react to the latest product. As we all know, a new technological device should have suitable various applications to operate. If this device is really advanced, and different from its ancestors, most of the old applications cannot be used in it. Software and phone application companies also need time to develop a new product for catching up the new trend, while the users cannot make full use of this fashionable thing. So customers who wait for a while can really have fun with it.
Last but not least, people usually spend a prohibitive price for purchasing the latest technological devices. Take the latest product of Apple, iPhone X, as an example. The price of this small device is over 10,000RMB in China, which is equal to 8-week average salary in my hometown. Some big fans save money, stop hanging out with friends, give up new clothes and cease travelling plans, just for buying a new cell phone. In contrast, as a student, I would prefer to wait for the price decreasing by thousands RMB in several months.
In conclusion, buying the most advanced technological devices is unnecessary an costly. Most of the new products actually have few big change from the last one. People can be more patient and wait till the majority have adopted them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 78, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ed technological devices is unnecessary an costly. Most of the new products actual...
^^
Line 9, column 78, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...ed technological devices is unnecessary an costly. Most of the new products actually have...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it till the majority have adopted them.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, really, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94385026738 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71406179567 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8220964725 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0454545455 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77272727273 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265518879347 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688850322528 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516196492432 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145984840676 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496542155012 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.