In our lives sometimes we like something and buy it immediately, but some times we wait and think about it. In my view waiting and thinking before taking an action to buy some cutting edge technology has some advantages. We can evaluate that how these new tools are practical, moreover, sometimes there are different defects in new products that are hidden before using it by real consumers. Therefore, its better to wait until many have bought it.
First, nowadays, there are many new technological devices in the market. Even we are not sure how they are practical. For instance, last month my brother bought a new sport watch. He expected that the watch would be useful in doing different exercise. However, it was a lemon. He told me that the watch was not working accurately as the sellers said him. So, if my brother had waited until many had bought the watch, he wouldn’t pay to this useless watch.
Secondly, new product have some defects in their early versions. As time pasts, manufacturers try to enhance and improve their products. For example, last week, I read an article about first generation of PlayStation 4. The article stated that it had some problems in playing some games. In next generations of PlayStation 4 the manufacturer omitted the problem.
In conclusion, if you want to not waist your money, you should wait until different people use the new product because new versions of that product will be better than it’s first generation, moreover, we are not sure new technological devises how really are practical.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In our lives sometimes we like something...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to wait until many have bought it. First, nowadays, there are many new tech...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: SAY_TELL[2]
Message: 'Say' cannot be followed by a direct personal object. Did you mean 'told'?
Suggestion: told
...s not working accurately as the sellers said him. So, if my brother had waited until...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wouldn’t pay to this useless watch. Secondly, new product have some defects ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e manufacturer omitted the problem. In conclusion, if you want to not waist ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: ITS_JJ_NNSNN[27]
Message: Did you mean 'its first generation'?
Suggestion: its first generation
...ons of that product will be better than it’s first generation, moreover, we are not sure new technolo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gical devises how really are practical.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 262.0 407.700716846 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93511450382 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67111497224 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587786259542 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.7313666132 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0588235294 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4117647059 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192718080544 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569405450119 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578340351071 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114415970448 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530508447921 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.