In modern days, with the rapid development of our society and technology, we are here in an area when repetitive tasks can be replaced by machines, and so workers have more options for a juicy job. However, there always been a controversy about whether having a diverse job will make employees be more satisfied. On the one hand, some people tend to consider that by doing a job with different duties, workers are easier to enjoy their job, and it can promote their interaction between others. On the other hand, some people reckon that many jobs require us to do the same task day in and day out, such as scientists in the laboratory, they might need to do the exact experiment for years. As for me, it is my firm conviction that employees’ quality of life are significantly improved by doing all kinds of tasks during work. There are many reasons, which I will illustrate further in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, if one faces various tasks and challenges in one’s work, one will be happier and more engaged in the work. This is actually quite a simple thing to understand because people can obtain different skills and knowledge through the process of dealing with different jobs. You see, monotonous jobs are surely dull and boring, the only benefit we can gain from a tedious job is the experience to endure a sole task, which is apparently, no good for our confidence and self-identity. On the contrary, a job that is not set in stone will inspire and motivate us, hence, intensify our efficiency, and the company can also be more prosperous.
Moreover, by doing various tasks, employees get the chance to see their work from different perspectives and build connections with people in other sectors. I have to acknowledge that my view on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own experience. Just take the case of my mother, who is completed career-oriented women, I see her as my role model. My mother works in a large international company, and her job requires her to communicate with lots of people from various departments. And unsurprisingly, instead of being tired by the complexity of her job, she really enjoyed the recognition that she got from it.
Nevertheless, as I said at the beginning of the passage, there still a voice that asserts dullness is indispensable to some careers. And they may rise scientists as an example. However, people who announce these thoughts have not thought it through. They must clearly distinguish the difference between necessity and satisfaction because most scientists derive satisfaction from their accomplishments, not only from their day-to-day work. Meanwhile, I think it is absurd to say scientific work equals to repetitive experiments. Just imagine the refinement and creative idea they have to possess in the experiment, maybe the routine steps of the experiments are fixed, but the part of thinking is never insipid.
In a nutshell, based on the above-mentioned reasons, I maintain my position that having employees dealing with all kinds of jobs are absolutely make them more satisfied.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'been'.
Suggestion: been always
...options for a juicy job. However, there always been a controversy about whether having a di...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'made'.
Suggestion: made
...g with all kinds of jobs are absolutely make them more satisfied.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, apparently, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, still, while, as for, i think, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2568.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 516.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97674418605 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95680295809 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 799.2 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8039395941 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.727272727 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95454545455 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189998428126 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523968971604 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506964689357 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100760357737 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076184777995 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.