Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Certain individuals may assert that doing the same task over and over for a while can contribute to an employee's skill development to perfection; despite acknowledging the validity of this claim, I still hold the view that this practice can be boring for employees. On the other hand, opting for diversity in task-doing will make workers well-rounded as well as help them to discover new skills.
The first reason which compels me to favor this idea is that when employees do the same occupation for an extended period, they eventually become bored. This can lead to a decrease in the productivity of a worker. Furthermore, in spite of the fact that the primary motivation of a person to work is the amount of money he obtains, the salary cannot push one forward for long. Such workers do not linger in companies and can be released very quickly. A vivid example to illustrate my point is my friend's case; last year, he got a job as a cashier, and his duties included only scanning goods. After a couple of months, he became so bored that he decided to leave the job.
Another argument to reinforce my position is related to the fact that a worker's variation of activity contributes to one's overall development. Doing various tasks, even unrelated together contributes to a specialists' understanding of other areas of their work. Moreover, this positively impacts their mental health and increases their spirit during work time. Workers go to work with greater motivation and, subsequently, the result of their labor gains. For many companies whose aim is a unified and smooth working system, this has become a priority.
The final point to substantiate my view has to do with the fact that if a person switches his monotonous working routine to expanded performing, after all, he discovers new abilities that were previously revealed. A lot of people work at their workplaces doing the same grey job and do not even suppose about their talents. In every person's mind, someday arises the idea of a more responsible position. The heads of companies notice only staffers with unique talents and traits. So, to become better types of themselves and stand out among others, they must try to realize new assignments.
In conclusion, it is my firm belief that realizing multifarious tasks helps to get rid of dull and grey worktime, improve their general growth and uncover new abilities in their work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...d over for a while can contribute to an employees skill development to perfection; despit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
... position is related to the fact that a workers variation of activity contributes to on...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd uncover new abilities in their work.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, while, after all, as to, in conclusion, as well as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93842364532 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75271733763 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583743842365 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4100887951 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.526315789 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3684210526 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52631578947 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163179542786 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460286936238 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363827394412 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832657627291 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324909798563 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.