Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than they do similar tasks all day long.
People spend most of their time at work and their willing from a job is different than others. Some people may hold the view that having a job with a variety of task is more rewarding than having a job with similar tasks. However, some others may take an opposite viewpoint. From my own perspective, the former belief is true. In what follows, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason for coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that a job with different tasks is more interesting. People have faced with a myriad of challenges during working, hence they are not bored.it also helps efficiency improve since employees always deal with attitudes to new tasks.my own experience is a compelling example of this. A couple of years ago, When I worked at a factory, I was one of the production experts. Our factory was produced a different of productions of milk such as yogurt, cheese and so forth. Since a lot of production, every day we have challenged with new problems. When our team addressed these problems we encouraged to solve another one. Hence, we did our best without wasting time and feeling tiredness.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that a lot of tasks helps people always be up-to-date. They have to learn new things and boost their knowledge such as learning new software, latest article about their work and so on. Following my experience, for solving new problems my coworker and I, read the articles about diaries. We knew all the changes in this field. Therefore, it helped us found innovative ways to improve our productions. In addition, we took classes about software and gain certification of them. These certifications helped me find a decent job.
In conclusion, this is my deep belief that a job with different tasks not only is interesting for employees but also helps them to be up to date. Therefore, I highly suggest that it is better to have a job with a variety of tasks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | farzaddanaei | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-02 | siminl | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...d their willing from a job is different than others. Some people may hold the view t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind substantiating'.
Suggestion: mind substantiating
...easons. The first reason for coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 635, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y we have challenged with new problems. When our team addressed these problems we en...
^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the latest'.
Suggestion: , the latest
... knowledge such as learning new software, latest article about their work and so on. Fol...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77551020408 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72336604666 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559766763848 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.272895955 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150641198402 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382286104281 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410448399753 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925760015773 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244130277521 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.