It is obvious that leader of a group plays an important role in a team. People should consider different factors when they are trying to choose a person as a leader. Some individuals state that a leader in order to take leadership position should have characteristics like being knowledgeable, talented, intelligent, self-confident, and so on. However, I strongly believe that honesty is the most valuable leadership quality. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss my view using some reasons and examples.
I think the most prominent trait that a good leader must have is honesty and integrity. Having this quality leads members of group to follow a leader. People can trust the leader and thus it helps a team to be more successful. For example, I worked in a research group in a big company, and my manager was not honest with me. He told me that if I did my duty properly and got satisfactory results, I could get a promotion, while after the end of project and obtaining good results, I was not promoted. As a result, after that I did not trust him and his dishonesty had has negative effects on my work and my working efficiency had decreased.
Moreover, I believe that when a leader is honest and sincere, it causes members of a group to respect him or her and to obey his/her orders. In addition, members will have good and strong relationships with leader. In spite of the fact that leader have some weakness points, people will cooperate with him in order to achieve their goals because he/she is a dependable person. For instance, when I was a student in university, I took part in a research group activity, our leader has not sufficient information in some areas, but he was an honest individual. Therefore, other members try and work harder to gain necessary information and get desirable results, although our leader could not guide us enough.
To sum up, in my point of view, the most important characteristics of a great leadership is sincerity and honesty. This way, people rely on him/her and have appropriate collaboration with each other and leader. It helps team meet its objectives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 585, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...st individual. Therefore, other members try and work harder to gain necessary informati...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der. It helps team meet its objectives.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, as a result, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82692307692 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90920835238 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524725274725 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5847696234 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4736842105 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1578947368 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36842105263 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127736457898 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447199681586 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265274419129 0.0737576698707 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832635389792 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214418808407 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.