You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or club. Do you agree or disagree that a person’s honesty is the most important thing to consider in deciding whom to vote for?Use reasons and examples to support your position.

I think the most prominent trait that a good leader must have is honesty and integrity. Having this quality leads members of group to follow a leader. People can trust the leader and thus it helps a team to be more successful. For example, I worked in a research group in a big company, and my manager was not honest with me. He told me that if I did my duty properly and got satisfactory results, I could get a promotion, while after the end of project and obtaining good results, I was not promoted. As a result, after that I did not trust him and his dishonesty had has negative effects on my work and my working efficiency had decreased.

Moreover, I believe that when a leader is honest and sincere, it causes members of a group to respect him or her and to obey his/her orders. In addition, members will have good and strong relationships with leader. In spite of the fact that leader have some weakness points, people will cooperate with him in order to achieve their goals because he/she is a dependable person. For instance, when I was a student in university, I took part in a research group activity, our leader has not sufficient information in some areas, but he was an honest individual. Therefore, other members try and work harder to gain necessary information and get desirable results, although our leader could not guide us enough.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 585, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...st individual. Therefore, other members try and work harder to gain necessary informati...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, as a result, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 52.1666666667 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 1977.66487455 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 242.0 407.700716846 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60330578512 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67295010239 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561983471074 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 618.680645161 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.68080201 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.272727273 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 5.45110844103 200% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.53405017921 44% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0895730354025 0.236089414692 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387519879691 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282566200235 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0721091795953 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00281316611255 0.0645574589148 4% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.