Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.
By and large, timing and having a schedule are considered as a focal point, and they usually rank among the topmost preoccupations an individual deals with in the lifespan. In this regard, while it may come out rather controversial whether in these days people pay more attention to their society, or they are less concerned about that, I posit that the latter is truer. I have some reasons for this claim, two of which will be explicated hereunder.
At the first place, it is believed that paying less attention to the community matters correlates closely to having more opportunities to get entertainment. Generally, between works, relationships, parental duties, academic efforts, and personal fulfillments, it is a wonder most of us can even find time to catch our breath, and when life gets so hectic, the level of stress will soar. In this condition, one of the best treatments is to get a worthy distraction, and an ideal distraction is to get worthwhile entertainment. Since people, nowadays, are taken aback by the hugeness of tasks that they are assigned to do, they are less interested to participate in different communal activities. An observation I have made recently can further clarify this. My mother used to attend different volunteering activities such as a construction project in the neighborhood. In those projects, she not only accumulated plenty of experiences but also helped the people who did not have a house at the time.
On the other hand, my sister whose field of study is civil engineering does not tend to participate in such activities. Instead, she is prone to spend her time with her friends, chatting, hanging out in different coffee shops, and so forth. So attached to her friends, my sister even does not pay enough attention to our family. This example may appear somewhat shallow, but it is clear that people, nowadays, do not care about the communal actions than they did in the past.
Secondly, another reason that reinforces the idea that people do not pay enough attention to their community ties in with the sense of competition. Simply put, in these days, by competing with others in the school, workplace and other places, people are more likely to become successful in the future. It means that they allot more time to improve themselves and find ways to develop their personality to become prosperous to keep up with other competitors on different occasions. Due to the fact that each person's goal is to become more and more successful, they may be less interested in helping others find solutions. For instance, my cousin is a clever student at the university. His parents are inclined to behave with him in a way that he must stay in the first place in the class in terms of academic performance. So enthusiastic towards his studies is he that does not want to miss a competition with his friends. He attends each contest in the university and even in the country. Moreover, he is prone to submit his papers in the conferences inside and outside the country because he wants to show his intelligence to his friends and classmates. In this condition, he does not have time to devote to social activities to improve his community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 508, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...nt occasions. Due to the fact that each persons goal is to become more and more success...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, such as, by and large, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 52.1666666667 169% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2647.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 541.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89279112754 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86912716576 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517560073937 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 829.8 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5998011211 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.291666667 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5416666667 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128696593581 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0344751625075 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462126748282 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758101771699 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159991657908 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.