young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping to their communities
Although some people think that the young people do not pay attention to their society in comparison to the past one, In my opinion, this comparison is really unfair because of some reasons that I will mention.
Firstly, nowadays young generation is busy, and they do not have extra time to spend half of that for other activities like helping. In these days, the young people in conjunction with the study have to work, because they need to gather money for their future lives. In fact, the young peoples’ expectations of life increase and encourage them to benefit from their time. So, the majority of them even do not have any time to have the amusement in their life or being a useful person in their society. However, in the past, the young people did either studying or working, not both of them in same time since this situation let them help to their society. Hence, this situation of the nowadays young people is incomparable with that past one.
In addition, the expectations of the people from young people increase that originate from the gap generation. In the past, people used to commute with their neighborhood family since they had this chance to become aware of their problems and helped them to resolve them. Nevertheless, now young people do not have this time and eager to go to the family or neighborhood assist them. Actually, now they do not enjoy these activities because they think they can spend their time for the more important issue. And as I said before, this difference arises from the changing of the people's view about the life. As a result, the second reason that causes people think hat nowadays young people's do not spend enough time for helping to their communities is the diversity of the new generation with the past.
Finally, the ways of the young people aid to their communities completely change. As I said before, today they do not have this time and eager to go to their family home and notice from their problem. In fact, instead of that activity, they prefer by utilizing of the technology call them or if they need money send it by the internet. Obviously, the ways of helping are totally unlike with the past. Accordingly, dissimilar method of helping creates this conception that the young people do not consider adequate time for aiding to their communities.
In conclusion, the difficulties of these days live that makes the young people an engaged generation, the unlike ways of helping, and by increasing the people's expectation from them develop this idea that they do help to their communities as the past one did.
- People learn easily from the friends beside them 60
- One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 81
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. 73
- TPO 5 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 67
- Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them Use specific examples and evidences to support your answer 30
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... ways of helping, and by increasing the peoples expectation from them develop this idea...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, really, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79147982063 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5195259913 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.423766816143 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7318451634 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.473684211 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4736842105 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.68421052632 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471523917947 0.236089414692 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182223678587 0.076458572812 238% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103249913767 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305720215958 0.150856017488 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846591375088 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.