The reading passage provides benefits of solar, in fact, renewable, energy to the entire world than non-renewable fossil fuels. In parallel, the speaker in the lecture points out that the energy from the sun, in other words, solar energy, has lots of advantages compared to fossil fuels.
The author explains that the reliance on fossil fuels decreases with solar energy, and claims that it last longer than non-renewables. And support their theory by providing vast consumption of usage of energy of humankind. The speaker supports further this argument by the offset of energy production. While the fossils produce energy to provide solar panels for now, later the solar energy panels could close the energy production offset in the future.
Secondly, the article cast a doubt on how the pollution caused by burning fossil fuels, on the other hand, the solar energy systems cause no harm since they have no harmful byproducts. Additionally, the lecturer points out that solar systems could be used in many different areas. For example, he mentions heating the water with this energy. Also, he mentions its health benefits.
Lastly, the costs of solar systems are less than fossil fuels, the author claims. Similarly, the speaker also mentions its financial benefits. Both provide the one-time purchase of solar panels. On the other hand, the maintenance of fossil fuels would cost enormously. Additionally, the speaker provides the tax reduction of solar panel usage for energy makes it a better choice.
Overall, both the author and the speaker agree that the solar energy systems have much benefits than the non-renewable fossil fuels.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...out that solar systems could be used in many different areas. For example, he mentions heating...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 83, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...gree that the solar energy systems have much benefits than the non-renewable fossil ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, second, secondly, similarly, so, while, for example, in fact, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28136882129 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51777643879 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51711026616 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3332493279 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8125 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433818183132 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145616452727 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113735633662 0.0662205650399 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273414002104 0.162205337803 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829083030125 0.0443174109184 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.