amphibian spread measures
The article states several measures to stop the spread of the cane toad population in Australia. This is because of the rapid multiplication of cane toads and being a threat to native animals that are not pests. The article provides three measures to stop the spread. However, the professor explains that these measures are ineffective and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that natural fences will be able to prevent the toads. They cite this reason from the past experience of it used for the successful prevention of rabbits. The professor refutes this point by saying that the fences won’t stop the spread of toads many of them are present in streams and rivers. They can be easily carried to the other side and thus making this method ineffective.
Second, the article posits that the toads could be destroyed by the help of volunteers. The article cites this claim by saying that the cane toads can be easily caught in simple traps and hands. However, the professor says that many of the volunteers will be untrained and they cannot distinguish between cane toads and the native one. This can lead to the destruction of the native species of toads as well.
Third, the article says that a disease-causing virus can be an effective measure to stop the population of cane toads. The virus will be specially designed, infecting only the cane toads. However, the professor opposes this point. She says that, since most of the cane toads from Australia are exported back to central and south America, it can cause disaster in the ecosystem over there.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...e toads. They cite this reason from the past experience of it used for the successful preventio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, third, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93703703704 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53704785075 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492592592593 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9575692481 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3125 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8125 7.06452816374 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108746622864 0.272083759551 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512716504065 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933607178206 0.0662205650399 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845022201948 0.162205337803 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101851988884 0.0443174109184 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.