The reading and the listening passages are both about leg bone of Tyrannosaurus rex (T.rex). While the reading article mentions that researchers reveal that some materials seem to be remain of blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen, the professor casts doubt on this founding by saying this information is skeptical.
The article of the reading claims that there is a soft, flexible organic substance in hollows in the bones that represent the remnants of red blood cells. Moreover, it is mentioned that because red blood cells are in vessels inside bones, so it is most likely the actual blood of T.rex. The professor, however, contends that this soft tissue could be lifted from bacteria (moist residue). Also, bacteria colonize hollows, so it is probably this organic matter is from it.
In addition, the writer states that with examination the researchers found the presence of spheres that could be red blood cells. The lecture, on the other hand, says there some places the researcher found another animal. If they found the same sphere, it will not be red blood cells. They do not, so it is probably it is not red blood cells. It could be a different mineral.
Finally, the reading adds that there is collagen which is associated with bone tissue. The professor refutes this point by saying we can find collagen in a different part of the body such as skin. Therefore, the collagen is probably from researches’ skin. Also, there is information that collagen does not stay more than 100,000 years, so it is fresh which suggests that this is not from T. rex.
All in all, the lecturer debunks all the three points in the reading.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89323843416 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5195327419 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516014234875 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7759062581 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9375 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0142996243031 0.272083759551 5% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00578347151138 0.0996497079465 6% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0124211761069 0.0662205650399 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00756961206046 0.162205337803 5% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0109754106799 0.0443174109184 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.