The reading and the listening passages are both about Jane Austin image. While the reading passage provides three reasons that there were some paintings that Jane on it, the lecturer explains that it did not.
First of all, the writer states that Austin’s family clearly recognized Jane in a portrait. Also, it is mentioned that for over a century the family itself has endorsed the claim. The professor, however, contends it is hard to prove that she is. Also, he says Jane has been dead for 17 years. Therefore, it is hard to recognize her.
In addition, the author of the reading mentions that there are some features in Cassandra’s sketch that clearly resembles Jane. The professor cast doubt on this by saying there are a lot of relative to Jane. In fact, according to the lecturer, one of the portrait is related to Jane’s niece.
Finally, the article claims that there is evidence that the painting was painted when Austen was a teenager. Also, it is added that Austin family hired one painter who was active 1780s exactly the period when Jane was the age of the girl painting. The professor rebuts this point. He says that William (the painter) did not sell the painting in London until Austin became more than 17 years old. So, according to the lecturer, the image in the portrait is not Jane.
To conclude, the lecturer debunks the reading passage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, so, therefore, while, in addition, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83966244726 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46125778497 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544303797468 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7624022318 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.6875 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8125 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100446720477 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338002434567 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0174965422662 0.0662205650399 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0487948907806 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305189513214 0.0443174109184 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.3589403974 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.2 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.