bees
The article states that bees were not exist 200 million years ago and provides three reasons to support this statement. These reasons are challenged by lecturer. She is of the opinion that none of them is true.
First of all, the author contends that there is no actual bee fossils from that time and the earliest bees fossils is relatived to 100 million years ago. This statemnet is challenged by the lecturer. She says that although it is correct that there is not fossils from bees that demonstrate the existence of them but it is because bees fossilize on tree rasins that at that time this was very scarce so they did not preserved till now.
Secondly, the writer argues that lack of flowering plants in that period indicate that bees were not at that time. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that bees in that period fed non-flowering plants like Fern and then by the evolution they adopted to fed from flowering plants.
Finaly, it is states in the article that the chambers structure lack caps that modern bees close their nest by it now. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits this by mentioning that chemical process were done that provided a water resistence substance that now is replaced by caps
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
The article states that bees were not exist 200 million years ago and provides thre...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'preserve'
Suggestion: preserve
...me this was very scarce so they did not preserved till now. Secondly, the writer arg...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at period indicate that bees were not at that time. The lecturer, however, rebuts...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, secondly, so, then, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78504672897 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35501038064 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532710280374 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0440671507 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346152031647 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13236205984 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11650097011 0.0662205650399 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203349335154 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843361296275 0.0443174109184 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.