The article and the lecture are both about going green. Whereas the author of the reading states that going green is not only beneficial for environment but also for an individual, the lecturer suggests that it is hard for an individual to go green with out support of multiple people. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
According to the reading, going green is beneficial for environment. The author mentions that pollution is reduced by minimizing the amount of waste. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that people prefer cheap products rather than costly ones. Additionally, he points out that coffee shop sells coffee in cheap cup material for higher profits.
Secondly, the author suggests that companies get more profits by going green. The article notes that going green earns trust of customers as a result, increasing the profits of a company. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggests that companies make cheaper products for higher profits. He elaborates on this by mentioning that the customers of any company shows interest in cheaper products rather than costly products.
Finally, the author posits that people can save money by going green. He contents that going green can reduce costs of many things used in our daily life. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that people would spend for installation of equipment rather than save money for further. She put forth the idea of how installation of solar panels increases the costs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...t is hard for an individual to go green with out support of multiple people. The lecture...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11811023622 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51822053897 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53937007874 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8276500926 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.4705882353 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9411764706 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277026517931 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105100948372 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127675811785 0.0662205650399 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181711844741 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606147234091 0.0443174109184 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.