birds
In the article points out that glass material that we use to builr windows are very harmful to wild birds, and suggest three solution that can be used to prevent birds from being injured. However the speaker in the lecture disagrees with these solutions and attacks each points made by the writer.
The auther begins with suggesting that responsible businesses can use one way glass widows, so people can see outside from the building, while birds cannot see inside. tThe professor in the listening states that there are flaws in this solution. He explains that even though birds cannot see from this kind of glass, they will see a reflection of trees and sky on the obscure side of the window, and hey want distiiguish it from the real sky or trees. Which will make them fly into the wth glass without paying attention.
Another solution that the writer mention to this problem is paint a colorful paterns on the window. She thinks that, people still can enjoy the outside sceen, while birds will see the stripes and avoid them. The lecturer brings up that these colorful painting will make rooms dark unless the openings are bigg enough, which can confuse birds and think they are wholes and try to go through them.
The last solution that the writer talks about is by equipping buildings with powerful electromagnets that resemble the magnetic signals that birds use to migrate. This will steer birds away from the building. Agai the professor rebuts this point by mentioning that birds use this signals only when they traveling long distances and they use their eyes and light to figure out their ways in short trips.
It can be summed up by accentuating that both the author and the speaker hold conflicting views about the possible solutions to birds` injuries that glass materials in the buildings cause.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ed to prevent birds from being injured. However the speaker in the lecture disagrees wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: TThe
...uilding, while birds cannot see inside. tThe professor in the listening states that ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y on the obscure side of the window, and hey want distiiguish it from the real sk...
^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tiiguish it from the real sky or trees. Which will make them fly into the wth glass w...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngs up that these colorful painting will make rooms dark unless the openings are ...
^^
Line 8, column 148, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...esemble the magnetic signals that birds use to migrate. This will steer birds away ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, still, while, in short, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88745980707 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27807094287 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56270096463 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6664032728 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.923076923 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273795616485 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112185628814 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840744727833 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168074922065 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497318262061 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.