Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals.
the reading discusses, some environmentalists believed that the government should take serious decisions for managing and storing coal ash. In opposite, representatives of the power company have a different view and debate that the new regulations are not necessary. The author listed three factors to support the latter view. However, the speaker finds all the reasons dubious and presents some evidence to refute all of them.
First, the power company claims that effective regulations are. for instance, every regulation must use specific material to prevent contaminations so, must use liner in every landfill. In contrast, the speaker asserts that using the liner is not a sufficient way. in other words, the liner must be used when we have new landfills or ponds. also, several of these disposals have caused damage to the groundwater and contaminate drink water. hence, she refutes this reason.
second, the author mentions that some statistics show making strict roles may discourage people to buy recycling materials and consider them dangerous. On the contrary, the speaker casts doubt on this issue and by standing that it is not caused the consumers to stop using ash constructs. like mercury which has fairly material that recycled safely.
finally, the reading passage argues that new strict rules will increase the price of electricity, on the other hand, the speaker states that it is true that it needs 15 billion dollars price but it only increases 1% of the expense of every family bills and it is trivial. Therefore, the speaker rebuts this reason too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the reading discusses, some environmentalis...
^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... claims that effective regulations are. for instance, every regulation must use spe...
^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...sing the liner is not a sufficient way. in other words, the liner must be used whe...
^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...ed when we have new landfills or ponds. also, several of these disposals have caused...
^^^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...roundwater and contaminate drink water. hence, she refutes this reason. second,...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
.... hence, she refutes this reason. second, the author mentions that some statisti...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 100, Rule ID: BUY_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'by'?
Suggestion: by
...g strict roles may discourage people to buy recycling materials and consider them d...
^^^
Line 9, column 290, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Like
...consumers to stop using ash constructs. like mercury which has fairly material that ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...rly material that recycled safely. finally, the reading passage argues that new st...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for instance, in contrast, in other words, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25196850394 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69124366894 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629921259843 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.161370017 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9333333333 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9333333333 7.06452816374 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0667087952363 0.272083759551 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0210094153328 0.0996497079465 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276330471216 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0385143019698 0.162205337803 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027877553676 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.