The reading material indicates three theories that the new and strict regulation are not needed for handling and storing coal ash in order to protect our environment. However, the listening passage disputes the claims made in the article. He claims that we definitely should establish a new strict rules.
First and foremost, although the author of the reading states the strict regulation have already existed. Besides, companies must use liner in new pond or landfill to make sure prevent leaking into the soil to the surroundings. On the contrary, the professor says that these regulations are not sufficient and liner used only when making the new land rather than the old land or landfill. Additionally, he points out that the liner causes big environment damage. Therefore, it is necessary to build a new rules.
Secondly, many companies concern that the strict rules may discourage the recycling of coal ash into their other items like concrete. Because their consumers are too scared to buy the dangerous products. Again, the speaker addresses the reason why this is an impossible situation is that dangerous material called mercury can storage in the products for a long time and be recycled safely.Also, it does not mean that the consumers would stop using it anymore.
Thirdly, for the increasing cost, the author brings his concern that the companies would have a negative attitude. That means they have to spend ten times the current expense. What's more, they would become unwelcomed by rising the electricity price. According to this, the listening material says that implements these rules will cost 15 billion dollar which seems too costly but just 1 percent of the electricity bill, we would think it is not a big deal for companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 299, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'rule'?
Suggestion: rule
...efinitely should establish a new strict rules. First and foremost, although the au...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 506, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'rule'?
Suggestion: rule
...erefore, it is necessary to build a new rules. Secondly, many companies concern th...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...h into their other items like concrete. Because their consumers are too scared to buy t...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 390, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
... for a long time and be recycled safely.Also, it does not mean that the consumers wo...
^^^^
Line 8, column 177, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...to spend ten times the current expense. Whats more, they would become unwelcomed by r...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11805555556 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63167874648 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6108118456 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2666666667 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.080972742667 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0225119392523 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361921871428 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0490634438955 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389562598053 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.