cane toad population
The provided material are concerned with the cane toads population which are are some large species native to america that used for protect farmers' crops in Australia. They multiplied hastily and menace the small native animals. The author states that some measures has been proposed recently that are successful and can stop toad's spread. In contrast, the lecturer repudiates this point through several counterarguments that are as follows.
Initially, the author says that one of these successful measures is building a national fence that can prevent toads from moving and facilitate controlling their population. However, the lecturer explains that this method viably can not stop toad's spread. Owing to the fact that maybe the toad eggs can have a reverse stream and pass the fence.
Second, the writer thinks that the toads, especially their young ones and eggs, can easily capture and destroy by some volunteers who join to stop the toad from reproducing. Yet again, the speaker underscores that the untrained volunteers can not understand differences between toad eggs and many of the Australian frogs. this approach may cause destroying a wide array of frogs.
The final point of contention between the article and lecture is developing a disease. The author claims that this disease may infect many reptiles and amphibian species, but it only will harm the cane toads and prevent them from maturing. On the other hand, the speaker explains that spreading a disease-cause virus can danger cane toads in america that are native in there. As author says, the disease affect a number of animals that can spread the disease by their transfering to america and peril the toads.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: are
...ed with the cane toads population which are are some large species native to america th...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 323, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... eggs and many of the Australian frogs. this approach may cause destroying a wide ar...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22710622711 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55979229558 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556776556777 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4107749692 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.928571429 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267660271043 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842011773838 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840937155459 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155938793481 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517153592548 0.0443174109184 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.