The cave paintings of Lascaux (in southwestern France) date to around 15,000 B.C.E. and are among the finest examples of prehistoric art known. Ever since the paintings were discovered, scholars have puzzled over their purpose. According to one widely discussed interpretation, the paintings were made to ensure a successful hunt. Several considerations support this view.
The reading states that Lascaux, a cave with a more detailed example of prehistoric art, had several paintings that reflect a successful hunt related to those people who lived in the time and provides three reasons to support it. However, the professor explains that these reasons actually have little support and refutes all of the reasons.
First, that the specific animals hunted were the subject of the painting in the cave, as the reading claims, is rejected in the lecture. The professor says there are some animals' paintings that are not hunted at all. According to the professor, some animals like cats, which have not been hunted by Paleolithic people, were painted on the cave, whereas some other animals like rhinoceros which have been hunted mostly, were not painted at all. Therefore, the paintings in the cave are not associated with hunting.
Second, based on the reading, the cave painting includes humans that might be the hunter. In contrast, the professor explains that there are some human figures that indicate they are not hunters. In addition, there are some paintings depending on the position of the human figures, like horizontally, that scholars do not know about the aim of these pictures.
Third, the author says that if someone painted a picture, it would represent a reality. The professor casts doubt on this point by saying that some paintings have an imaginary purpose and have nothing to the hunt. For example, in ritual ceremonies, people use these kinds of pictures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ctually have little support and refutes all of the reasons. First, that the specific a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ave nothing to the hunt. For example, in ritual ceremonies, people use these kind...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, whereas, for example, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0843373494 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46811247071 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2898260042 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213364711272 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812908256269 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498009528179 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124281671832 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319068428128 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.