First it s true that growing and selling crops locally saves money on transportation costs but that will not necessarily make the new broccoli cheaper for consumers Yes the new breed of broccoli will be able to survive the hot summers on the east coast bu

Essay topics:

First, it’s true that growing and selling crops locally saves money on transportation costs, but that will not necessarily make the new broccoli cheaper for consumers. Yes, the new breed of broccoli will be able to survive the hot summers on the east coast, but unfortunately it will also have lower yields than the broccoli grown on the west coast. This means that farmers on the east coast will harvest less broccoli per hectare, and so they’ll have to sell their produce at a higher price. This price increase will cancel out the savings on transportation, so the east coast consumers will probably not save any money buying the locally grown broccoli.
Second, even though researchers are using traditional breeding techniques in creating the new broccoli, the public might still be suspicious. You see, financial support for this research comes from the same companies that created genetically modified crops in the past. Because those companies used genetic modification techniques with other crops, many American consumers distrust those companies and might distrust any project that those companies are involved in. This might lead the consumers to reject the new broccoli as well.
Third, it’s true that fresh broccoli has the greatest amount of health-promoting nutrients and vitamins, but is that a good argument for creating a new breed of broccoli that can be grown on the east coast? Not necessarily. Other vegetables that are already grown on the east coast contain similar nutrients that broccoli contains. For example, kale, a leafy green vegetable, provides comparable health benefits. And kale is in some respects better. It’s grown on the east coast not only during the summer, but also during the fall and winter. Instead of wasting money and resources on creating new vegetables, we should educate people about eating fresh healthy vegetables that are already available locally.

The article states that East Coast in the United States tends to produce its broccoli rather than transport it from the West Coast due to higher prices for shipping and other measurements. It provides three beneficial factors for this project. However, the professor explains that this project is neither successful nor beneficial and refutes each author's reasons.

First, the reading claims that producing broccoli on East Coast has a lower cost for consumers than those produced on the West Coast. The professor opposes this point by explaining that it may be true consumers could save their money by buying locally produced broccoli, but in the hot summer on the East Coast, broccoli has a lower yield than ever. She also states that this process affects broccoli's farmer profit, and they have to sell their vegetables at higher prices. Therefore, farmers and consumers cancel out transport' profits and do not save any money.

Second, the article posits that locally produced broccoli has much more desirable than others. In contrast, the professor says that those companies that produce locally broccoli use genetic modification. Moreover, this activity cause distrust among consumers who use these products. Finally, it is likely that consumers reject any project that is performed by a genetic mutation.

Third, the reading says consuming pristine vegetables right after harvesting, especially broccoli, has more nutrition and vitamins. The professor casts doubt on this point by saying that it is better to educate people to eat new and fresh vegetables can cultivate in local regions, which they are not only can produce in summer, but also is possible to produce in fall or even in winter, rather than harvesting some kinds of vegetables, like broccoli with a lower chance of success.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26736111111 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52708848584 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.2823654879 49.2860985944 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.692307692 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257556889224 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922911490711 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748284951618 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151998117584 0.162205337803 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877887359374 0.0443174109184 198% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.