Eco-certified Wood Products
The article introduces the topic of the use of eco-certified wood products. More specifically, the author discusses the reasons contributing to the unwillingness of US companies to obtain eco-certification. The lecturer in the listening passage disagrees and believes that thus stated reasons are not true.
In the reading, the author begins by stating that, US citizens are subjected to the exaggerated advertisement of products so eco-certified products won't matter in their purchase. The lecturer, however, disagrees with this viewpoint. He states that US consumers trust the claims done by an independent organization and it becomes an influential factor for their purchase.
The author claims that US citizens are cost-minded consumers. As the cost of getting the eco-certification of product is passed onto the consumer so they are unlikely to buy those products. Again, the lecturer believes there are flaws in the writer's argument. The speaker points out when the cost difference is marginal, eco-friendly consumers are more likely to purchase eco-certified products rather than cheap and uncertified products.
Another reason why the author holds his claim is because he states that the sales of these products are domestic and don't require considering the opinion of the foreign consumer. The professor in the listening passage is doubtful that this is accurate. He suggests that the possibility of foreign companies with eco-certified products to invest in the US market has increased so the US companies should be wary about the competitive market in the near future.
To sum up, both the writer and professor hold conflicting views about this matter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 243, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ecturer believes there are flaws in the writers argument. The speaker points out when t...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 118, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ales of these products are domestic and dont require considering the opinion of the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48837209302 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18023196765 2.5805825403 123% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546511627907 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6656165711 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.142857143 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.64285714286 7.06452816374 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338611177002 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103007322109 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128674897309 0.0662205650399 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165290706167 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883877812075 0.0443174109184 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.