ecoturism
Many people can think that Eco-Tourism is the best form of Tourism development, because are highly known the disavantages of massive tourism for the landscapes, nature and people who lives in those now crowded places.
In this sense, Eco-Tourism seems as a friendly and mutually advantage way of tourism administration, this because it would allow a deeper sense of care of the nature and environment, for example, building lodges instead of big hotels, and pushing for a strong policy of nature conservation through the government. This way of tourism would also enable to local people being more involved in this industry, even with more jobs opportunities.
But, the lecturer points out some doubts about this arguments, first, because, even if you build small lodges or little inns, you are affecting the environment, and even more, you need to build roads and infrastructure for this industry with all the bad consequences for the natural environment that this implies. Also, she talks about the Pollution that comes with tourist and all its activities. Moreover, she also refuses that local people could be benefited with these entrepreneurships, because she claims that majority of well-paid jobs are taken by people form the cities, and not by locals.
At the end, there is no perfect industry, not even Eco-Tourism. This could be less damaging than massive tourism, but it has some disvantages too, and those has to be addressed by the authorities in order to fulfill a real protection of the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 48, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e lecturer points out some doubts about this arguments, first, because, even if you ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l a real protection of the environment.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, well, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21862348178 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93820036034 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582995951417 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.5508328589 49.2860985944 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.125 110.228320801 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.875 21.698381199 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.3589403974 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.2008830022 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.