The lecturer disputes the author's suggested claims that edmontosaurs migrated to the south every winter to run away of the harsh weather conditions. She provides several reasons to cast doubt about the author's claims.
First, according to the text edmontosaurs need to migrate to the south to find food in winter because othewise, they would be starving. The speaker finds this idea debatable. He contends that indeed there is no need for these animals to migrate to the south because the long day light in summer time, and the continuous sunshine make dead plants readily available in winter. She states that these animals can easily find in winter. Therefore, they won't need to travel long distances searching for food
The lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that since these animals live in herds, they should migrate. The lecturer contends that not all animals living in herds need necessarily to migrate. Instead, She deliberately gives an example of the Rosivult alc, that practically live in herds for other purposes which includes finding protection inorder to avoid being harshly attacked by predators.
Finally, the author argues that edmontosaurs are physically fit to migrate long distances at a high spead which prove the migration theory. The lecturer refutes this claim by stating that theoretically speaking they are capable of doing so. However, few members of the herd can travel long distances She contends that particularly the juvenile group of the herd might not be able to travel long distances. Accordingly, the adult group would not have other choice, but to stay with them because they need their protection.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: SUMMER_TIME[2]
Message: Use simply 'summer'.
Suggestion: summer
...the south because the long day light in summer time, and the continuous sunshine make dead ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, finally, first, however, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20676691729 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58972353462 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6683781609 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.538461538 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197049969353 0.272083759551 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766590818484 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129264238757 0.0662205650399 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131557726492 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778333593144 0.0443174109184 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.