The reading and the listening passages are both about eco-certification of wood companies. The reading passage provides three reasons that wood companies in the U.S will not do the certification. However, the professor casts doubt on this and says they will do it.
First of all, the article of the reading states that American consumers would not pay attention to the certification because they do not place trust in them. The professor, on the other hand, says that the customers do not treat all the products the same. He adds that they actually distinguish between products and convince independent consumers because it is trustworthy.
In addition, the writer mentions that eco-certified wood will be expensive because the companies will pay for agencies to certify their products. The lecturer rebuts this point by saying it is true that they will increase their price but it is a small fee which is less than 5%. He adds that Americans will choose the best when it comes to the environment and other things especially if it is a small fee.
Finally, the author of the reading claims that pursuing certification would make sense for woods’ companies if they marketed their products internationally. The professor refutes this idea. He avers that if Americans companies do not do the certification, the international companies will enter that market with eco-certification, which will affect the American companies.
To conclude, the listening passage debunks all the points that were made in the reading passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...ee reasons that wood companies in the U.S will not do the certification. However,...
^
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will not do the certification. However, the professor casts doubt on this and sa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, however, if, so, in addition, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25203252033 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0538061559 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520325203252 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3270312205 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3846153846 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0854558152652 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329998185427 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396551644377 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0495129035661 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445624331565 0.0443174109184 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.