The article explains a mass-extinction and provides three explanations for it. On the other hand, the professor states that although the author's explanations are plausible, they are not good explanations and refutes each of them.
To begin with, the article claims that the decline of sea level is one possible explanation. The professor, however, refutes this point by stating that it is not a good reason. At first, she admit that the declining of sea level is true. But she mentions that coastal and shallow species were able to adapt themself with environmental changes because the changes was gradually about several million years.
Moreover, the reading states that massive climate cooling is another theory. The professor, again, refutes this point by saying that rempreture decreasing still present in atmospher. She mentions that it is true that sulfur dioxide result in declining in tempreture. Yet this decreasing has continued for a short time. She mentions that sulfur dioxide combine in the air and result in raining. Therefore, she mentions that sulfur dioxide did not stay in the air and did not cause laking of sunlight.
Finally, the reading states that asteroid strike is the third theory. The professor contends this point by saying that astriod striking was occured before that time. She provides exact information about the time it was occured: about 12 million years before mass extinction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article explains a mass-extinction a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...planations and refutes each of them. To begin with, the article claims that t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'admits'.
Suggestion: admits
... it is not a good reason. At first, she admit that the declining of sea level is true...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...species were able to adapt themself with environmental changes because the change...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...radually about several million years. Moreover, the reading states that ma...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd did not cause laking of sunlight. Finally, the reading states that asteroi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, moreover, so, still, therefore, third, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26872246696 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6618721737 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541850220264 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4365277623 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7333333333 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1333333333 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120019451085 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387126897246 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455237064906 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723192584886 0.162205337803 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258207969364 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.