Essay topics: TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task
The explanations of the fact that animals of the past were appreciably larger than they are today are discussed in the reading and in the lecture. Although the writer gives us some plausible explanations of the fact, the lecturer disagrees with the analysis and claim that the author has failed to use a common sense to verify the data. Viewpoints of the writer and the speaker will be discussed in details below.
Firstly, the passage states that it is believed that atmosphere of the early earth had a greater volume of oxygen which stimulated growth of living creatures. The audio suggests that this prospect is dubious due to the vast activity of volcanic activity at the time of dinosaurs which led to emission a huge volume of harmful gases. Thus the plant's air had rather less oxygen than the writer tends to state.
Secondly, the author claims that the early earth had the abundant plant life which provides the ancient mammals and reptiles with plethora of nutrients. The speaker casts doubt on the stance because unearthed fossils showcase that those plants had a low level of nutrient due to the poisonous atmosphere and low level of CO2 which is required for the plants' growth.
Finally, the text avers that the early earth did have a warmer climate and animals which inhabited the planet did not need to spend energy on keeping themselves warm. The voice from the audio debunks the prospect. He claims that today's world do not support the writer's belief. In fact, contemporary animals and humans who live in warm climate tend to have relatively small size because a big body is a disadvantage in warm conditions because it requires eating a lot of food to sustain a needed level of energy.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
stimulated growth of living creatures.
stimulated the growth of living creatures. //the 'noun one' of 'noun two'
which led to emission a huge volume of harmful gases.
which led to the emission of a huge volume of harmful gases.
which led to emitting a huge volume of harmful gases.
today's world do not support the writer's belief.
today's world does not support the writer's believes.
tend to have relatively small size
tend to have a relatively small size
because a big body is a disadvantage in warm conditions because it requires eating a lot of food to sustain a needed level of energy.
because a big body is a disadvantage in warm conditions which requires eating a lot of food to sustain a needed level of energy.
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 12
No. of Words: 294 250
No. of Characters: 1392 1200
No. of Different Words: 162 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.141 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.735 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.413 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 71 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 43 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 22 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.404 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.417 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.343 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.591 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.086 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...mission a huge volume of harmful gases. Thus the plants air had rather less oxygen t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'plants'' or 'plant's'?
Suggestion: plants'; plant's
... level of CO2 which is required for the plants growth. Finally, the text avers that...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ms that todays world do not support the writers belief. In fact, contemporary animals a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82993197279 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44814800696 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557823129252 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2006944404 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261810951495 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851035735339 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589795662936 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13732008562 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363368273345 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.