Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice of removing dead trees from affected areas and using the wood for lumber, plywood,and other wood products. There are several reasons why salvage logging is beneficial both to a damaged forest and to the economy. First, after a devastating fire, forests are choked with dead trees. If the trees are not removed, they will take years to decompose; in the meantime, no new treescan grow in the cramped spaces. Salvage logging, however, removes the remains of dead trees and makes room for fresh growth immediately, which i s likely to help forest areas recover from the disaster. Also, dead trees do more than just take up space. Decaying wood is a highly suitable habitat for insects such as the spruce bark beetle, which in large numbers can damage live, healthy spruce trees. So by removing rotting wood, salvage logging helps minimize the dangers of insect infestation, thus contributing to the health of the forest. Third and last, salvage logging has economic benefits. Many industries depend upon the forests for their production, and because of this a fire can have a very harmful effect on the economy. Often, however, the trees that have been damaged by natural disasters still can provide much wood that is usable by industries. Furthermore, salvage logging requires more workers than traditional logging operations do, and so it helps create additional jobs for local residents.
The reading passage and lecture are both about excluding damaged wood from the forest which is called salvage logging. The author strongly postulates that using dead trees for lumber, plywood, and other wood products are essential to both economies and destroyed a forest. On the other hand, The listening adamantly delineates that it results in serious long-lasting terminal consequences to a forest because of several compelling reasons.
First and foremost, According to the author of the excerpt that if we don't eliminate the dead trees, they will take a great amount of time to decay and other new ones can't grow in this area. Nonetheless, the professor in the lecture offsets these points by declaring that the new trees grow in rich nutritional soil but it doesn't give pleasure conditions to grow even if they remove those dead trees.
On top of this, The professor elaborates by bringing up the point that spruce bark beetles have lived in Alaska for a long time without causing any problem to trees and it just only attracts the insects but birds and other animals which contribute a lot to it arrive in that area so the author's opinion is somewhat groundless. these claims refute the writer's implications about insects cause a dangerous situation to the health of the forest.
The text lastly insists that it is greatly beneficial to economic because a lot of manufactories use the forests to produce productions and this operation requires a great deal of labour so it creates supplementary jobs to local residents. The speaker in the lecture counters these indications by asserting that removing wasted trees needs to use a helicopter or potent mechanisms, thus its high-priced to maintain it. Furthermore, the professor also mentioned that it requires special training to give knowledge of excluding trees to local inhabitants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...to the author of the excerpt that if we dont eliminate the dead trees, they will tak...
^^^^
Line 2, column 168, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...unt of time to decay and other new ones cant grow in this area. Nonetheless, the pro...
^^^^
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...es grow in rich nutritional soil but it doesnt give pleasure conditions to grow even i...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... a lot to it arrive in that area so the authors opinion is somewhat groundless. these c...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...authors opinion is somewhat groundless. these claims refute the writers implications ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, lastly, nonetheless, so, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1059602649 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78225311847 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586092715232 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.6412400929 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.2 110.228320801 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2 21.698381199 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217766596243 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083050817054 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556366457688 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117738985013 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538018484238 0.0443174109184 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.