The author in the passage talks about the large animal Elephant, he describes the reasons why the Elephant fascinate humans. On the contrary, the professor casts doubt on the assumptions that reading passage is illustrated. She supports her ideas by expressing other argument on the basis of reading.
First of all, the writer states that elephant have the ability to know about their death previously. However, the lecturer claims that going away from the herd does not mean Elephant is aware of its death; she puts forward her idea by saying that due to having age the teeth of older Elephant become down and it needs to search some softer vegetation. Going to watery area where soft vegetable grows Elephant could feed them and then dies.
Second, the passage indicates the artistic ability of the elephant. But the professor points that trainer deliberately train the elephant to do certain types of painting by controlling or stroking their ear since Elephant’s ear is so sensitive. Without understanding about the painting the Elephant draws some flowers or other Elephants.
Third, the writer also provides an example, according to which the elephant fear mice. On the other hand, the speaker states this idea is misinterpreted; she also strengthens her argument by adding that Elephant reacts to mice only if they are unfamiliar to mice. Reacting to unknown animal is a natural phenomenon. But in the zoo where Elephant is familiar to mice and realizes that it was not harmful for them they don’t react to mice.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67079050184 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596837944664 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3963631499 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0769230769 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163166489525 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570652289705 0.0996497079465 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429582747496 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095637312062 0.162205337803 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214905658738 0.0443174109184 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.