Integrated
Both the article and the lecturer discuss causes of "quackers", which is explained to be unidentified sound underwater. On one hand, the article shows the plausible causes of the phenomenon. On the other hand, the professors refutes each of the arguments from the reading respectively.
First and foremost, the reading claims that the peculiar sound could have been caused by the calls of male and female ocra whales during a courtship ritual, since they inhabit the areas in where the strange noise was picked up. However, the professor refutes this point by stating that the whales, in fact, live near the surface of the ocean. As a result, there is no chance that the "quackers" came from ocra whales.
In addition, the article attributes the phenomenon to giant squids, which could not be detected with their soft bodies and no skeleton. Nonetheless, the professor casts doubt on this point by emphasizing that the bizarre sound disappeared after two decades, but the squids have always been around. For that reason, it is unreasonable to conclude that the phenomenon was caused by giant squids.
Last but not least, the author of the article indicates that the stray sounds from some state-of-the-art technology, which was designed not to be detected by sonar and used in foreign submarines, contributed to the phenomenon. In contrast, the professor rebuts this argument. The professor elaborates on this by explaining that the froglike sound changed the directions quickly and no engine noise was heard. That is to say, there was no way to build a submarine to be that fast in changing directions without noises from the engine.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both the article and the lecturer discus...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents from the reading respectively. First and foremost, the reading claims t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ackers' came from ocra whales. In addition, the article attributes the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enomenon was caused by giant squids. Last but not least, the author of the ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'as a result', 'on the other hand', 'that is to say']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235668789809 0.261695866417 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.152866242038 0.158904122519 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0636942675159 0.0723426182421 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.031847133758 0.0435111971325 73% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00955414012739 0.0277247811725 34% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130573248408 0.128828473217 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0477707006369 0.0370669169778 129% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.01736174154 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0254777070064 0.0208969081088 122% => OK
Particles: 0.0031847133758 0.00154638098197 206% => OK
Determiners: 0.162420382166 0.128158765124 127% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00636942675159 0.0158828679856 40% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0127388535032 0.0114777025283 111% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1709.0 1645.83664459 104% => OK
No of words: 270.0 271.125827815 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.32962962963 6.08160592843 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.355555555556 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.277777777778 0.287516216867 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.177777777778 0.187439937562 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.140740740741 0.113142543107 124% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01736174154 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540740740741 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 53.72905075 53.8517498576 100% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.7692307692 21.7502111507 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7479096568 49.3711431718 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.461538462 132.220823453 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 21.7502111507 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 0.878197800319 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 48.547008547 50.5018328374 96% => OK
Elegance: 2.13114754098 1.90840788429 112% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.162617940369 0.142949733639 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0760658958059 0.0787303798458 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.660579974567 0.631733273073 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.119605898886 0.139662658121 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.498117649497 0.414875509568 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0393269021678 0.0530846634433 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.