Integrated Essay
Reading put forth a situation, being very famous settlement in England, archeologist are having trouble in
saving valuable archeological sites in this modern 20th century, while lecture refutes that policy has to be followed
in order to promote archeologist work.
Firstly, lecture talks about that law to investigate a place prior to construction is being incorporated.
If any artifacts are discovered, it is mandatory to save it and proving details about that artifact,thereby
preventing destruction of archeology work. This argument is against reading, as reading states increasing
number of population make development of new fascinating buildings inevitable to accommodate large no of people.
Secondly, lecture states next step to prevent destruction, that law is imposed on citizens that archeologist will be
sponsored by the construction companies and not by the government. This argument is contradictory to the reading passage,
that archeology field is suffering from financial crisis due to lack of enough money from government to explore many new sites and projects.
Thirdly, reading implies that many people are avoiding to enter archeology field due to less number of jobs available in market. But the lecturer denies, encouraging and appreciating archeologist work will increase job opportunities and widen scope of practice Thus, it serves as incentive for many people to join this field and explore many more places.
As a result, lecture successfully proved that benefits of archeology are more than drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...land, archeologist are having trouble in saving valuable archeological sites in t...
^^^
Line 2, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uable archeological sites in this modern 20th century, while lecture refutes that...
^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e refutes that policy has to be followed in order to promote archeologist work. ...
^^^
Line 6, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , thereby
... and proving details about that artifact,thereby preventing destruction of archeology w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st reading, as reading states increasing number of population make development of...
^^^
Line 8, column 100, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ildings inevitable to accommodate large no of people. Secondly, lecture states ...
^^
Line 10, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed on citizens that archeologist will be sponsored by the construction companies ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, while, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70689655172 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18577350016 2.5805825403 123% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612068965517 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6009489505 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.111111111 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4444444444 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 12.0 4.09492273731 293% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.3589403974 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.8541721854 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.2367328918 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.7273730684 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.