integrated essay -TPO 41
In the reading section, the writer contends that there are three reasons that cause representatives of power companies to be in disagreement with creating some regulations for handling and storing coal ash because environmentalists believe that this substance is dangerous; however, in the lecture, the professor casts doubts on the reading points by presenting some counterarguments.
Firstly, the writer claims that nowadays there are some regulations for this purpose including using liner, a material that leads coal ash not to leak into the soil and contaminate it; in contrast, the lecturer rejects this notion by stating that this material can be used in new pond or landfill which are used for getting rid of coal ash, but there are a lot of old pond or landfill which are applying for this purpose and there isn't any liner in them, so current regulations isn't enough.
Secondly, even though the author asserts that creating these laws can prompt the population of consumers of recycled coal ash products to be reduced, the lecturer believes that this reduction is unlikely because this situation, creating regulations for using a dangerous material, happened in the past for using Mercury, but there wasn't any reduction in population of consumers of its recycled products.
Finally, according to article, these strict regulations can lead to an increase in disposal and handling costs for power companies which ends in an increase in the price of electricity; nonetheless, the professor challenges this idea too and mentions it can just increase the costs about 1% which it is worthwhile for having a clean environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the reading section, the writer conte...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by presenting some counterarguments. Firstly, the writer claims that nowadays...
^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...are applying for this purpose and there isnt any liner in them, so current regulatio...
^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...y liner in them, so current regulations isnt enough. Secondly, even though the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... so current regulations isnt enough. Secondly, even though the author asserts...
^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...n the past for using Mercury, but there wasnt any reduction in population of consumer...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... consumers of its recycled products. Finally, according to article, these str...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29770992366 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94405224515 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526717557252 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 65.0 21.2450331126 306% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0777731259 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 347.0 110.228320801 315% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 65.5 21.698381199 302% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 23.0 7.06452816374 326% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419423959394 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.245018201634 0.0996497079465 246% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395426750818 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245018201634 0.162205337803 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395426750818 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 36.3 13.3589403974 272% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 5.5 53.8541721854 10% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 5.55761589404 263% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 28.6 11.0289183223 259% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.35 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.42419426049 127% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.0 10.7273730684 270% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 28.0 10.498013245 267% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 29.0 11.2008830022 259% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.