integrated essay TPO18
The reading is about the possible solutions to prevent the Torreya taxifoha from extinctions. However, the professor contradicts with those solution fore theses reasons.
Firstly, in the reading, it is said that it is possible to preserve the Torreya from extinction by restablish it in the same condtion in the coolesr, dampest areas of the microclimate. On the contrary, the lecture refutes the argument by stating that the environment is presents a difficults challenges for the Torreya to survive due to the global warming and drained condition. Therefore, it is difficult to prepare this condition for them.
Secondly, even though the reading claims that the moving of the Torreya to anothe palce with convenience condition such as further north, the professor presented an example to argue this. He said the Black locus trees when theses tres have been moved to the north, have negative influences on the other species. Therefore, this is not present a likely option.
Thirdly, the passage says that preserving in the research center is a good idea. However, the professor mentions an opposing view that since the research center have not a proper capacity to preserve the large and diverse population, and therefore the deases will be a menace for the Torreya.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading is about the possible soluti...
^^^
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this solution' or 'those solutions'?
Suggestion: this solution; those solutions
...However, the professor contradicts with those solution fore theses reasons. Firstly, in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the dampest'.
Suggestion: , the dampest
...h it in the same condtion in the coolesr, dampest areas of the microclimate. On the contr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 206.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19902912621 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73676646042 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582524271845 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1172563639 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.1 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311001399586 0.272083759551 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106629120063 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651764513089 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167977157684 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471032159403 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.