integrated essay TPO13

Essay topics:

integrated essay TPO13

The reading passage and lecture are both about to privatize fossil remains which have been used since the eighteenth century. The article strongly postulates that it is adversely influenced by both experts of artefacts and the general public. The listening adamantly delineates that it is exaggerated somewhat because benefits outweigh drawbacks due to several compelling reasons.
First and foremost, According to the author of the excerpt that people want to present the fossils in a museum rather than a sale to individuals and they bother that it leads to decline in public interest in antiques. Nonetheless, The professor offsets these points by declaring that the customers keenly expose those remains into low positional part of the society such as public school and it doesn't mean less exposure to the people.
On top of this, The professor in the listening elaborates by bringing up the point that the author's opinion is not realistic because the scientist always identified before it is publicly offered to purchase by millionaires. these claims refute the writer's implications about experts have less access to look at the fossils so it means they lose the important details of ancient life and in some situation. Furthermore, museums and scientists haven't any capable to reject against the wealthy buyers.
The text lastly insists that fossil collectors often demolish worthwhile scientific proofs regarding fossils they haven't discovered yet and the most buyers haven't any professional training so they hardly know about the exposition of mysterious early extinction animals' life. The speaker in the listening counters the indications by asserting that scientist should pay attention in the undiscovered traces such as location instead of sold ones.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ed by both experts of artefacts and the general public. The listening adamantly delineates tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ts of artefacts and the general public. The listening adamantly delineates that it ...
^^^
Line 2, column 395, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...he society such as public school and it doesnt mean less exposure to the people. On t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...rates by bringing up the point that the authors opinion is not realistic because the sc...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ly offered to purchase by millionaires. these claims refute the writers implications ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...on. Furthermore, museums and scientists havent any capable to reject against the wealt...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...cientific proofs regarding fossils they havent discovered yet and the most buyers have...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...vent discovered yet and the most buyers havent any professional training so they hardl...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, lastly, look, nonetheless, regarding, so, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42909090909 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77914309881 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632727272727 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8014598346 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.3 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321893481126 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106287935737 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813229462807 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178210872045 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355959300206 0.0443174109184 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.3589403974 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.8541721854 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.42419426049 121% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.