The main idea of both the reading and the lecture is about buzzers who advertise products for a company secretly. Although the reading states three critics for this idea, the buzzer man in the lecture denies these ideas and categeorically refute them all.
First, the reading explains that consumers should be aware of buzzing, otherwise, buzzers decieve people with wrong information. On the other hand, the lecturer mentions that companies choose buzzers between people who have used their products and felt comfortable with them. Thus, people who are buzzers believe in usefulness of the products.
Secondly, the author claims that consumers would lose the chance to think critically about the products and would accept them without thorough thinking. The lecturer, however, states that people always ask plenty amount of questions about the products before buying them. For example, they ask about the price and how well can product do service and how long the buzzer man have used the product. Without any information, people are less likely to purchase any product.
Eventually, the reading mentions the spreading mistrust between societies. In contrast, the lecturer says that if a company don't produce effective goods, they won't be able to hire more buzzers. Also, the good products leads to increase the number of buzzers. Thus, people would trust on buzzers and products they introduce.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 289, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...elt comfortable with them. Thus, people who are buzzers believe in usefulness of the pr...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...st, the lecturer says that if a company dont produce effective goods, they wont be a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30630630631 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43536693194 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576576576577 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0027735484 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6153846154 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0769230769 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329099407778 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122730175989 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060755810664 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19673150026 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053301433286 0.0443174109184 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.