Integrated writing TPO40

Both the reading passage and the lecture are about the establishment of a permanent station on Venus. the author of the reading passage feels that it is impossible to build permanent station on Venus. However, this is challenged by the lecturer. He is of the opinion that building of a stable station on Venus is possible.
First of all, the author argues that the atmospheric pressure of Venus is very high, 90 times higher than that of the Earth. In the article, it is mentioned that at such high-pressure anybody on the surface of Venus would be crushed. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that station can be placed at about 50 kilometers above Venus surface, where atmospheric pressure is nearly the same as that of the Earth. So, the staion and humans wouldn't be destroyed.
Secondly, the writer contends that it is necessary to transport water and oxygen from the Earth to Venus, as there is no water and oxygen. In the article is mentioned that the Venus atmosphere is mostly composed of CO2, nitrogen, and sulfuric acid and rarely contains oxygen. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer. He said that Venus contains chemical materials and carbon dioxide which can be used to generate water and oxygen.
Finally, the writer posits that the amount of sunlight reaching the Venus surface is limited. It is included in the article that a thick layer of cloud and carbon dioxide will prevent the adequate amount of sunlight available in the Venus surface so that the generation of electricity through the solar cells is not adequate. In contrast, the speaker says that above 50 kilometers from the Venus surface, there is an adequate amount of light reaches which can be used to produce electricity to power machines and equipment. So, the establishment of the permanent station on Venus is possible.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...shment of a permanent station on Venus. the author of the reading passage feels tha...
^^^
Line 2, column 449, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...of the Earth. So, the staion and humans wouldnt be destroyed. Secondly, the writer con...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, in contrast, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.4613686534 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87138263666 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64100496163 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443729903537 0.540411800872 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 481.5 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.0491516439 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1176470588 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52941176471 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464734844312 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14306522163 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067778874617 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268362225399 0.162205337803 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730014117834 0.0443174109184 165% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.