The article states that four-day workweek for four-fifths of normal pay option would benefit the economy as well as the individual companies and the employees who decided to take the option and provides three reasons of support. The professor explains this option won't affect the profit, economy, improvement of employees life quality and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that it will increase the company's profits. The lecture refutes this point by stating that four-day workweek may force to cost a lot more money. If some employees choose this option, the company needs to hire a new employee. Hiring a new employee will cost more to train and provide medical services. Because medical will be same for four-day and five-day workweek employees. It will be required more space which is more costly.
Second, the article posits that four-day workweek will reduce unemployment. However, the professor contends that it will not create more space for the new hire. Company will not want to hire a new employee because of the high cost. They might choose another option to propose overtime for other employees with some incentives. They also may think four-day workweek employee can do same as five-day workweek employee. So, it won't decrease unemployment.
Third, the reading avers that this will beneficial for individual employees. The lecture opposes this point by saying that it may present some risk. It can decrease the ability to work of employees. As a result, they will not able to develop their skills and miss the chance to promote for better options. Four-day workweek employee may not be promoted to administration because this needs five days monitoring and managing other employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'costing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: costing
...tating that four-day workweek may force to cost a lot more money. If some employees cho...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, well, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53481875535 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492857142857 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.681552281 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.6315789474 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7368421053 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305642831084 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100690218167 0.0996497079465 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684369720279 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202648567342 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459366760399 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.