inteligence
According to the reading, visual-spatial people are known as their talent in problems solving related to space understanding which is illustrated by the lecturer with an example of chess masters.
The reading states that visual intelligent people can recognize asymmetrical structures such as buildings, paintings and faces as well as replaced objects. In addition, their intelligence gives them the ability to draw the patterns they watch, usually when they only see them in brief amount of time. As lecturer defines to support the reading, chess players can draw Logical communication models of a chess board that was used in a real game, but if there are no patterns in the model, the player cannot draw it.
The reading declares that people gifted with visual-spatial brain can make and change mentally images as well as drawing pictures and maps with spatial information in their brain. They also can rotate complicated forms by seeing them in visual aspects. Thus the professor mentioned blindfold chess to illustrate the reading. She states that the players move table to table and play at least 10 games and just by visualizing the chess board as someone tell them the last move of their competitor. In other words, they have to memorize a mental picture of the game.
The reading states that humans with visual-spatial intelligence can foretell and plan before any happening. To put it another way, their geometrical memory enable them to predict the actions and understand their outcomes. That’s why majority of them like playing games. Due to this, the professor indicates that strategies and plans are not just moves for chess players; they picture each game's own patterns and give them position to predict the next move. In addition, they can learn specific moves from their past plays strategies so that they can use them again in their future games.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-09 | yasaminkhb | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...forms by seeing them in visual aspects. Thus the professor mentioned blindfold chess...
^^^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tells'.
Suggestion: tells
... visualizing the chess board as someone tell them the last move of their competitor....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, well, at least, in addition, in brief, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09771986971 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65890639808 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5667752443 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4335315068 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.785714286 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.